[ Home ] [ About CESJ ] [ The Just Third Way ] [ Capital Homesteading ] [ Site Map ]

Reprinted from The Washington Post,
"Letters to the Editor," September 22, 1998, A16
"The Elusive Third Way"

"The Elusive Third Way"
CESJ letter to editor, Washington Post

The Just Third Way:
A New Vision for Providing Hope, Justice and Economic Empowerment


A Quick Comparison of Capitalism, Socialism and the "Just Third Way"


Elements of CESJ's Third Way


Graphic Overview of the Expanded Ownership Paradigm

The Post’s Aug. 30 editorial "As Russia Abandons Reform" asserts that "there is in fact no ‘third way to prosperity.’ " Let’s examine this point.

On the one hand there is capitalism, an economic system governed by market forces but where economic power is concentrated in the hands of a few who own or control productive capital. On the other hand, socialism, in its many forms, is an economic system governed centrally by a political elite, with even more highly concentrated ownership and economic power. Logically, a "third way" would be a free-market system that economically empowers all individuals and families through direct and effective ownership of the means of production--the best check against the potential for corruption and abuse.

A mistake in the editorial, and one made by many academics and economists today, is to equate democracy and the market system with the top-down, Wall Street capitalist model, with its growing gap of wealth and power between the rich and the poor. That there is excessive corruption under capitalism and socialism, even where governments are democratically elected, should come as no surprise. Lord Acton warned us years ago about systems that concentrate power.

Capitalist theorists such as Milton Friedman pay no attention to concentrated ownership of labor-displacing technology. Marxist theorists do, but conclude that the state should own and regulate all means of production. Keynesians offer a feeble synthesis between these two models of development based on the premise that maldistribution of ownership is acceptable.

The so-called "third way" of Bill Clinton and Tony Blair follows the Keynesian model. As recognized by Bill Greider in Chapter 18 of One World, Ready or Not: The Manic Logic of Global Capitalism, Louis Kelso in 1958 fathered a real "third way," a comprehensive systems approach to solving the structural problems of Russia and other economies impacted by centralized control over global money and credit.

As Daniel Webster maintained, "power necessarily and inevitably follows property." If Russia still is hoping that the West will offer a true "third way" to help save the Russian economy, it should turn to Louis Kelso, not Bill Clinton or Tony Blair or others unwilling to address the root problem of concentrated ownership in a globalized economy.

NORMAN G. KURLAND
President
Center for Economic and Social Justice
Washington


Binary Economics: The New Paradigm,
ISSEI Conference, Bergen, Norway. - Rodney Shakespeare
Louis Kelso’s Economic Vision for the 21st Century


Louis Kelso's Critique of Karl Marx's Das Kapital


A Personal Journey to the Just Third Way
[ Home ] [ About CESJ ] [ The Just Third Way ] [ Capital Homesteading ] [ Site Map ]
The Center for Economic and Social Justice - www.cesj.org
P.O. Box 40711, Washington, D.C. 20016 - Phone: 703-243-5155, Fax: 703-243-5935

thirdway@cesj.org (e-mail)

CESJ is a non-profit 501(c)(3) educational and research organization,
contributions to which are tax-deductible under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.