| Home | About CESJ | Get Involved | Just Third Way | Capital Homesteading | Justice-Based Mgt. | Library |

 Capital Homestead Vehicles

The Community Investment Corporation




The Community Investment Corporation (CIC) has been designed to serve as a for-profit land planner and private sector developer geared to rational innovation and change at the community level. The CIC would plan land use and develop the land within designated urban and rural enterprise zone for industrial, commercial, agricultural, residential and public purposes. It would sell and lease the land and structures for public and private uses and impose charges for improvement and maintenance. To avoid restraints on competition the CIC would normally not own other businesses that choose to locate on CIC-developed land.

The CIC would function just as the Rouse Corporation did in building the planned community of Columbia, Maryland or as the Reston Corporation did in building Reston, Virginia—but with a difference. It would turn community residents into its principal shareholders. Citizens would accumulate assets and share in the profits from development (which normally flow to outside investors) to supplement local incomes from wages, welfare and other sources. As shareholders and through their representatives on the CIC's board of directors, local citizens could also hold land planners and CIC managers accountable for local land use decisions.

The CIC strategy and its institutional structure for mobilizing citizen action are easily adaptable to areas of virtually any size, such as land surrounding nodes of a mass transit system, a downtown renewal area, or an inner-city neighborhood. The CIC can even be adopted for rebuilding an entire city, metropolitan area or natural region of the country. Enterprise zones are ideal test sites for CIC demonstrations. High technology industrial and research parks also make attractive CIC candidates.

While the CIC would aim at creating an environment within demonstration development areas for stimulating private sector growth and new private sector jobs and entrepreneurial opportunities, its unique emphasis is on widespread participation, particularly in the ownership and control of land, buildings and infrastructure which must be fabricated upon the community's land for expanding the local economy. Area residents would "earn" their shares in the CIC through a Community Shareholders' Participation Plan developed and approved by citizens within the development area. Companies attracted to the area would be encouraged to adopt ESOPs so that area workers could also earn shares and share profits from the companies for which they work.

Without the broad-based ownership approach, low-wage workers within a development area can easily be exploited by outside investors and companies seeking to compete with low-wage companies in the developing world. This weakness can be converted into a strength and magnet for companies willing to allow their employees to link their future increases to increased productivity through frequent profit sharing, equity accumulations and dividend incomes. Lower fixed labor costs in broadly-owned local companies, particularly those applying Justice-Based ManagementSM to encourage an ownership culture, can reduce capital flight and increase job security and employee incomes, without increasing product costs. Such companies can then become America's models for global competition.

One word of caution. The Community Investment Corporation (CIC) is radically different from not-for-profit Community Development Corporations (CDCs), Community Foundations, and Community Land Trusts, which do not provide direct ownership power and dividends to the citizens in the area. These tools of development launched in the "War on Poverty" of the 1960s too often produced poorly-managed enterprises whose ownership and control frequently fell into the hands of the few who politicized control over the organizations and local jobs. These approaches failed to decentralize access to economic power and profits by spreading broadly personal ownership of local enterprises. By centralizing ownership, CDCs empowered local leaders, not the people. The CIC, on the other hand, is designed to empower every citizen directly
.


How Would the CIC Work?

Control over capital credit largely determines who will own and control productive assets and share in future profits. The CIC—by using a special type of real estate investment trust ("REIT"), a credit democratization vehicle that works similar to that of an employee stock ownership plan ("ESOP")—would create new owners of undeveloped land and newly created assets, without taking existing property away from present owners. With the power to borrow funds from any private or public sector source, the CIC could purchase land for development from present owners. Publicly-owned land could be donated for development by the CIC, keeping local land in the hands of local voters. Public condemnation powers could also be used to enable local voters to acquire land for CIC development projects.

CICs and companies adopting ESOPs would be financed primarily through state and local industrial revenue bonds, supplemented with conventional market-rate loans from local banks and other traditional sources of productive credit. Such funds could then be used both for acquiring shares in the CIC and for meeting the financing needs of companies operating in the development area. In turn, the CIC could use the funds for acquiring and developing land. ESOP companies would be another conduit for financing on credit new machinery and buildings, working capital, acquisition of shares from retiring owners, etc.

CIC shares could be acquired for the accounts of residents and other eligible persons generally with little or no down payment, based on funds borrowed by the CIC and secured by the general credit of the CIC plus land and assets held by the CIC. The CIC itself would guaranty repayment of stock acquisition loans, pledging CIC assets (i.e., land, structures, equipment and receivables) as collateral. Credit for purchasing CIC shares would be repaid wholly with future CIC profits earned primarily from sales and leasing of developed land. Residents would not be personally obligated in the event of default on the share acquisition loans. As the CIC loans are repaid with CIC profits, CIC shares would be allocated among the individual CIC accounts of community households according to the points they earn under the Community Shareholders Participation Plan. The CIC would also serve as a community-based "stock exchange" for repurchasing CIC shares from outside investors or residents who move outside the community.

The CIC could also provide attractive discounts in the sale or leasing of land for commercial or industrial purposes to corporations adopting ESOP financing techniques for their employees or residents of the community. Separate profit centers and maintenance subsidiaries of the CIC would be financed generally by loans which, when retired, would earn additional property incomes for their employees and community residents.

The end result of channeling credit through CICs and ESOPs is to keep as much as possible of future equity accumulations (i.e., "capital gains") and development profits in the hands of community citizens, rather than being drained out by speculators, wealthy outside investors, outside consultants or local exploiters of the community.

080503


Search CESJ's web site with Google Search >
Google
http://www.cesj.org

| Home | About CESJ | Get Involved | Just Third Way | Capital Homesteading | Justice-Based Mgt. | Library |
The Center for Economic and Social Justice - www.cesj.org
P.O. Box 40711, Washington, D.C. 20016 - Phone: 703-243-5155, Fax: 703-243-5935

thirdway@cesj.org (e-mail)

CESJ is a non-profit 501(c)(3) educational and research organization,
contributions to which are tax-deductible under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.